MYSTERY ACTRESS IN SAN FRANCISCO: ETTA ?????

mystery

These two Cabinet cards present quite a mystery. The dramatically dressed and attractive young woman in the top cabinet card is simply identified as “Etta”. She appears to be an actress and my research reveals a large number of actresses named Etta who were stage performers around the turn of the century. I have been unable to determine this actresses identity, but a leading candidate might be Etta Butler (1879-1903). Etta Butler was a well-known actress and impersonator. She began her career at age 19 with the Tivoli Chorus in San Francisco. A year later she became a member of the “Around New York in Eighty Minutes” company. She was later featured in Frohman  comedies. She was last seen in “The Liberty Belles” at the Madison Square. Because of her popularity and promise, she was retained by David Belasco in a long term contract. She died of Typhoid fever in Roosevelt Hospital, in New York City at age 24. This mystery lady was photographed by Bradley and Bulofson of San Francisco, California. The bottom cabinet card has an inscription on the reverse signed by “Etta”. Are these two cabinet cards, taken by the same photographer, portraits of the same woman? One can see enough resemblance between the two images to hypothesize  that they are likely the same “Etta”. Take a look at another cabinet card by these photographers by clicking on the category “Photographer: Bradley & Rulofson”. That very same click will provide the reader with additional information about the photographers of this image.

Published in: on September 28, 2010 at 12:01 am  Comments (9)  
Tags: , , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://cabinetcardgallery.com/2010/09/28/mystery-actress-in-san-francisco/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

9 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. This cant be that Etta Butler then, since this photograph is from the 1880s. Definitely an actress, though, with that skirt length and pose.

  2. I am a defendant of Rulofson who most likely was the photographer he died in 1878.

    • Yes, Etta Butler was too young. Would you check out burlesque star Marion Elmore? … who I believe is fortunately posted elsewhere in the Gallery, possibly a little younger.

      • Great detective work on your part. The photograph I incorrectly identified as possibly Etta Butler, looks very much like Marion Elmore. However, the name “Etta” is written on the reverse of the photograph. The question remains. Who is Etta?

  3. Wondering if these photos could be of a young Etta Hawkins, stage actress and comedienne? She was born in 1865, so that fits in with the time these photos seem to have been taken. She married the stage actor (and later, producer) William Morris in the 1890’s. Etta Hawkins Morris and William Morris were the parents of Chester Morris, the popular screen actor.

  4. The woman in the photos are a young May Robson(1958-1942). These were most likely taken just after she came to America from her native Australia in the 1870s. She is quite beautiful. Most Golden Age film buffs know Robson as an old lady in numerous movies from the 30s and 40s.

  5. I realize May Robinson was born in 1858 only a typo but I have other questions. The only photo I could find thru goggle imagery is said to been taken 1883-1910. In my family this is a picture identified as taken by Wm H Rulofson and he died in 1878. I found no reference to May Robson referred to as Emma. Her birth name is said to be Mary Jeanette Robinson. That is interesting as Rulofson’s daughter was Mary Jeanette/

    • This photo truly remains an interesting mystery in regard to identifying this actress. The mysteries surrounding each cabinet card is part of what makes them so intriguing.

  6. I’ve learned to sometimes disregard writing on photo-cards. Not always but sometimes. They can be misleading as they might not refer to a sitter by their actual name but by a ‘nickname'(at the request of the sitter) or by a ‘role’ they played on the stage. It may sound outrageous but ‘alias’ names may also be used by women involved in extramarital affairs and may not want to be identified by her husband. They refer to themselves to their lover by an alias name. While names and writings on cards are undoubtedly helpful; I sometimes also rely on identifying the person visually, especially if they are an actress.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: